Demand Hair Lounge v. Midvale Indemnity Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20223:21-cv-02051California1,711 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DEMAND HAIR LOUNGE, et al., Case No. 21-cv-2051-MMA (MDD)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

MIDVALE INDEMNITY COMPANY, et [Doc. No. 3] al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 On October 2, 2021, Plaintiffs Demand Hair Lounge and Christina Day (“Plaintiffs”) initiated a state court action against Midvale Indemnity Company (“Midvale”), Homesite Insurance Company (“Homesite”), Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc. (“GBS” and collectively with Midvale and Homesite, “Defendants”), and Does 1–30. Doc. No. 1. On December 8, 2021, Defendants filed a notice of removal to this Court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. Id. Homesite and GBS (collectively, “Moving Defendants”) now move to dismiss the claims against them. Doc. No. 3. Plaintiffs filed an opposition, to which Moving Defendants replied. Doc. Nos. 8, 9. The Court found the matter suitable for disposition on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to

27 1 Midvale does…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.