Moody v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20223:18-cv-01110California2,603 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RONNIE L. MOODY, GARY T. Case No.: 18cv1110-WQH-AGS

DEANS, BILLY R. WILLIAMS,

11 and DONNEL E. JONES, ORDER 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, DANIEL

PARAMO, RODRIGUEZ, J.

MCGEE, J. SALAZAR, D.

RAMOS, ADAMS, J. HERRERA,

W. EDROZO, E. CRUZ, J.

DURAN, AVILA, I. BRAVO, and

DOES 1-50,

20 Defendants. 21 HAYES, Judge: The matters before the Court are the Motion to Substitute Party filed by Plaintiff Donnel E. Jones (ECF No. 72) and the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 78). I. BACKGROUND On May 31, 2018, Plaintiffs Moody, Deans, Williams, and Jones, incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, initiated this action by filing a Complaint against Defendants California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Daniel Paramo, Rodriguez, J. McGee, J. Salazar, D. Ramos, Adams, J. Herrera, W. Edrozo, E. Cruz, J. Duran, Avila, I. Bravo, and Does …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.