Kinney

Johnson v. Kinney

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20223:20-cv-01354California1,183 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY JOHNSON, Case No.: 20-CV-1354-JO

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT

v. JUDGE HUFF’S MOTION TO

DISMISS AND GRANTING

DAVID KINNEY, an individual; et al.,

MOTION TO STRIKE

Defendants. 16 17 18

20 Defendant Judge Marilyn Huff filed a motion to dismiss with prejudice for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). In the alternative, Judge Huff moves to strike the parts of the complaint naming her as a defendant pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f). For the reasons stated, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT and Defendant's alternative motion to strike is GRANTED. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed a complaint against Storix, Inc. and multiple individual persons, including judges from the state and federal courts. Defendants filed several motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.