Aguilar

Aguilar v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20223:20-cv-01768California5,344 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANCISCO A., Case No.: 20-cv-01768-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON JOINT MOTION FOR

v. JUDICIAL REVIEW

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting

Commissioner of Social Security1 15 Defendant. [Doc. No. 17] 16 17 18 On September 9, 2020, plaintiff Francisco A. (“plaintiff”) filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of defendant’s denial of his application for disability benefits. Doc. No. 1. Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for Judicial Review (the “Joint Motion” or “Jt. Mot.”). Doc. No. 17. In the Joint Motion, plaintiff requests to have his application for benefits remanded to the Social Security Administration (the “Administration”) for further proceedings, and defendant (“defendant” or the “Commissioner”) moves to have her determination that plaintiff is not disabled affirmed. 26 27 28 See generally id. The Court has carefully considered the parties’ arguments, the applicable law, and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.