Oliver

Oliver v. Mihelic

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20223:21-cv-01807California1,744 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS OLIVER, Case No.: 21cv1807-LL-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. REMAND [ECF No. 10] KRISTIN TAVIA MIHELIC, et al., Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Thomas Oliver’s Motion to Remand. ECF No. 10. Defendants, Kristin Tavia Mihelic, Tiffany Louise Carroll, Louise Decarl Adler, and the United States of America, filed an Opposition [ECF No. 14], and Plaintiff filed a Reply [ECF No. 16]. The Motion is fully briefed, and the Court deems it suitable for submission without oral argument. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the Motion. I. Background Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit in San Diego County Superior Court, and the operative first amended complaint (“FAC”) was filed on September 15, 2021. ECF No. 1-2 at 2-8. The FAC alleges that the Defendants caused injury to Plaintiff through negligent or other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.