Gross
Gross v. Stufflebean
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20223:21-cv-02109California969 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARO B. GROSS, Case No.: 21-CV-2109 JLS (DEB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS
v. JOCELYN MICHELS
STUFFLEBEAN, JOHN
JOCELYN MICHELS STUFFLEBEAN;
STUFFLEBEAN, DAVID I. GROSS,
JOHN STUFFLEBEAN; DAVID I.
MIEKE STRAND, LAUREN E.
GROSS; MIEKE STRAND; LAUREN E.
JONES, AND BART CALL’S
JONES; JULIE A. AMEDE; JOSEPH F.
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS
DERROUGH; WILLIAM HOYT; and
BART CALL,
(ECF No. 10) 18 Defendants.
Presently before the Court is Defendants Jocelyn Michels Stufflebean, John Stufflebean, David I. Gross, Mieke Strand, Lauren E. Jones, and Bart Call’s (collectively, “Moving Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss (“Mot.,” ECF No. 10). No opposition to the Motion has been filed. See generally Docket. The Ninth Circuit has held that, pursuant to a local rule, a district court may properly grant a motion to dismiss for failure to respond to a motion. See…