Pina

Pina v. Sacuan Security and Police

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20223:21-cv-01577California633 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ROBERT ANTHONY PIÑA, Case No. 3:21-cv01577-JAH-BLM

CDCR #BN-1661,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION PURSUANT vs. TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) AND 12 § 1915A(b)(1) AND FOR FAILING

SACUAN SECURITY & POLICE;

TO PROSECUTE IN COMPLIANCE

SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT,

WITH COURT ORDER

Defendants. REQUIRING AMENDMENT 15 Plaintiff Robert Anthony Piña, while incarcerated at Kern Valley State Prison in Delano, California, and proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 7, 2021. (See “Compl.,” ECF No. 1 at 1.) Piña claimed Sacuan Security and Police and the San Diego Police Department violated his “legal rights” on an unspecified occasion when an unidentified security guard assaulted him at the Sycuan Casino, and refused to return his personal property. (See id. at 3.) I. Procedural History Piña did not prepay the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.