Saul
Black v. Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KATHLEEN BLACK, Case No.: 20cv00772-NLS
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
Social Security, JUDGMENT; and Defendant. 16 (2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
[ECF Nos. 16, 17]
20 Kathleen Black (“Plaintiff”) brings this action under the Social Security Act, 42 21 U.S.C. § 405(g), and seeks judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of 22 Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for supplemental security 23 income (“SSI”) based on disability under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (“the 24 Act”), 42 U.S. C. §§ 1381 et seq. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. 25 ECF Nos. 16, 17. Plaintiff filed a Reply. ECF No. 18. After considering the papers 26 submitted, the administrative record, and the applicable law, for the reasons set forth 27 below,…