Navarro

Williams v. Navarro

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20223:18-cv-01581California7,959 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LANCE WILLIAMS, Case No.: 18cv1581-TWR(KSC)

CDCR #AG-2394,

REPORT AND RECOMMENDA-

Plaintiff, TION RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

O. NAVARRO; E. ESTRADA; J. MEJIA;

[Doc. No. 114.] and A. SILVA, 16 Defendants.

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP) in this civil rights action pursuant to Title 42, United State Code, Section 1983, alleging defendants violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution because they were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. [Doc. Nos. 19, 116.] Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants J. Mejia; O. Navarro; E. Estrada; and A. Silva seeking judgment in their favor on the first, second, and third causes of action in the Second Amended Complaint. [Doc. No. 116.] Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment also pertains to defendants R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.