Daigle

Daigle v. City of Oceanside

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20223:19-cv-01180California1,544 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON LEE DAIGLE et al., Case No.: 19-CV-1180-BAS(WVG)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE

v. PETITION TO APPROVE

SETTLEMENT INVOLVING A

CITY OF OCEANSIDE et al.,

MINOR

Defendants. [Doc. No. 85.] 16 17 Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ unopposed ex parte motion for approval of a settlement involving a minor, R.A.Q. (or “Minor Plaintiff”). Having considered the moving papers, the Court finds the settlement is fair, reasonable, and in the best interest of the minor. The motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND A. Allegations1 Minor Plaintiff’s claim arose out of the (1) alleged the false arrest and alleged mistreatment of her mother, decedent Gwen Daigle, by Oceanside Police Department

27 1 The factual allegations herein are for background purposes only. They remain allegations 28 police officers on October 19, 2018, (2) out of Gwen Daigle’s incarceration and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.