Cleveland v. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20223:19-cv-02141California4,891 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DON CLEVELAND, et al., Case No.: 19-cv-02141-JM-JLB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING

v. PLAINTIFFS/COUNTER-

DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DE-

LUDWIG INSTITUTE FOR CANCER

DESIGNATE ONE PORTION OF

RESEARCH LTD, et al., ONE DOCUMENT Defendants. 16 [ECF Nos. 111, 112]

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM.

18 19 Before the Court is a Motion to De-Designate One Portion of One Document filed by Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants Don Cleveland, Arshad Desai, Frank Furnari, Richard Kolodner, Paul Mischel, Karen Oegema and Bing Ren (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). (ECF Nos. 111, 112.) Plaintiffs seek to de-designate one portion of one document (LUDWIG0001443), specifically the statement that “overall the Branch is being seen as post-mature.” (ECF No. 111-1 at 2.) Defendants Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd. (the “Institute” or “Ludwig”), Chi Van Dang, Edward A. McDermott, Jr., and John L. Notter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.