Cleveland v. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20223:19-cv-02141California4,891 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DON CLEVELAND, et al., Case No.: 19-cv-02141-JM-JLB
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING
v. PLAINTIFFS/COUNTER-
DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DE-
LUDWIG INSTITUTE FOR CANCER
DESIGNATE ONE PORTION OF
RESEARCH LTD, et al., ONE DOCUMENT Defendants. 16 [ECF Nos. 111, 112]
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM.
18 19 Before the Court is a Motion to De-Designate One Portion of One Document filed by Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants Don Cleveland, Arshad Desai, Frank Furnari, Richard Kolodner, Paul Mischel, Karen Oegema and Bing Ren (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). (ECF Nos. 111, 112.) Plaintiffs seek to de-designate one portion of one document (LUDWIG0001443), specifically the statement that “overall the Branch is being seen as post-mature.” (ECF No. 111-1 at 2.) Defendants Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd. (the “Institute” or “Ludwig”), Chi Van Dang, Edward A. McDermott, Jr., and John L. Notter…