Hale

Hale v. Villalpando

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20223:22-cv-00024California950 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DYLAN SCOTT HALE, Case No.: 22cv-24-LL-JLB No. 00141227HD,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION

PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES

OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(h)(3) ANNE E. VILLALPANDO, U.S. Navy AND 16 Commander; JAMIE I. ROMAN, U.S. Navy Commander; JUDSON M. KIRK, (2) DENYING MOTION FOR Commander; JESS COMBS, Deputy APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND 18 Director of Operations, MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA Defendants. PAUPERIS AS MOOT

20 [ECF Nos. 2, 3] 21 Dylan Scott Hale (“Plaintiff”), a military prisoner currently housed at the Miramar Naval Consolidated Brig in San Diego, California, proceeding pro se, has initiated this civil action on January 5, 2022 pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). See Compl., ECF No. 1 at 1. Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) when he filed his Complaint;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.