Jacome

Jacome v. IRS of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20223:21-cv-02083California1,637 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEXANDER JACOME, Case No.: 21-CV-2083 JLS (MSB)

CDCR #BD-1845,

ORDER: (1) DENYING MOTION TO

Petitioner, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; v. (2) DENYING MOTION TO

APPOINT COUNSEL; AND

(3) DISMISSING SECOND IRS OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT

Respondents. OF HABEAS CORPUS WITHOUT PREJUDICE 18 19 20 21 On December 2, 2021, Petitioner Alexander Jacome (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this action pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, but failed to pay the $402 civil filing fee or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). See ECF No. 1. Petitioner sought a writ of mandate from this Court directing his early release from state custody and requiring payment of his “stimulus money.” Id. at 1– 3. On December 16, 2021, the Court dismissed this action without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.