Santillan

Santillan v. Verizon Connect Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20223:21-cv-01257California1,328 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO HIRAM SANTILLAN, on Case No.: 21cv1257-H-KSC behalf of all others similarly situated 12 aggrieved employees, ORDER RE JOINT MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF DISCOVERY Plaintiff,

DISPUTE (PLAINTIFF’S

14 v. CONTENTION INTERROGA- TORIES TO DEFENDANT) VERIZON CONNECT, INC., a Delaware

corporation, [Doc. No. 23.] Defendant. 18 Before the Court is the parties Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery Dispute. [Doc. No. 23.] In the Joint Motion, plaintiff seeks an order compelling defendant to provide supplemental responses to certain contention interrogatories. Defendant responded to these interrogatories with boilerplate objections and by referring to documents as permitted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(d). [Doc. No. 23, at p. 16.] For the reasons outlined more fully below, the Court finds that plaintiff’s request for an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.