Oliver

Oliver v. Mihelic

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20223:21-cv-01807California4,287 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS OLIVER, Case No.: 21cv1807-LL-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

v. DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE [ECF Nos. 5, 9] KRISTIN TAVIA MIHELIC, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Presently before the Court are two Motions to Dismiss. ECF Nos. 5, 9. The first motion is Defendant “United States’ Motion to Dismiss Claims One and Three Through Seven of the Removed Amended Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Failure to Allege a Cognizable Claim” (hereinafter “United States’ Motion to Dismiss”). ECF No. 5. Plaintiff, Thomas Oliver, proceeding pro se, filed an “Objection” in response to the United States’ Motion (hereinafter “Opposition to United States’ Motion to Dismiss”) [ECF No. 11], and Defendant United States filed a Reply [ECF No. 13]. The second motion is the “Individual Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Claim Two of the Removed Amended Complaint for Failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.