Sanchez-Rivera

Sanchez-Rivera v. Archambeault

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20223:21-cv-01654California531 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN SANCHEZ-RIVERA, Case No.: 21cv1654-LL-MSB

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. APPOINT COUNSEL

PALOMAR HEALTH; PALOMAR [ECF No. 5] MEDICAL CENTER ESCONDIDO; and 15 DOES 1-10, inclusive, 16 Respondents.

18 Petitioner, a detainee in the custody of the Department of Homeland Security, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Currently before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel. ECF No. 5. Habeas petitioners do not have a Sixth Amendment right to counsel, see Knaubert v. Goldsmith, 791 F.2d 722, 728 (9th Cir. 1986), but a district court has discretion to appoint counsel for a habeas petitioner whenever “the court determines that the interests of justice so require” and such person is financially unable to obtain representation. See Title 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.