Papciak
Breaking Code Silence v. Papciak
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BREAKING CODE SILENCE, Case No. 21-cv-00918-BAS-DEB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS v. PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CHELSEA PAPCIAK aka FILER, et al., (ECF Nos. 35, 36) 14 Defendants. 15 Presently before the Court are Defendant Jennifer Walker’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 35) and Defendants’ Jenna Bulis, Chelsea Filer, Martha Thompson, and BreakingCodeSilence, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 36). Plaintiff filed Oppositions and Objections to the Motions. (ECF Nos. 39–42.) The Court finds these matters suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the Motions to Dismiss. BACKGROUND This lawsuit is a trademark and organizational dispute between various parties involved in a movement to raise awareness of…