Papciak

Breaking Code Silence v. Papciak

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20223:21-cv-00918California3,042 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BREAKING CODE SILENCE, Case No. 21-cv-00918-BAS-DEB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS v. PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CHELSEA PAPCIAK aka FILER, et al., (ECF Nos. 35, 36) 14 Defendants. 15 Presently before the Court are Defendant Jennifer Walker’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 35) and Defendants’ Jenna Bulis, Chelsea Filer, Martha Thompson, and BreakingCodeSilence, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 36). Plaintiff filed Oppositions and Objections to the Motions. (ECF Nos. 39–42.) The Court finds these matters suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the Motions to Dismiss. BACKGROUND This lawsuit is a trademark and organizational dispute between various parties involved in a movement to raise awareness of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.