Produce Pay, Inc. v. FVF Distributors Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20223:20-cv-00517California2,212 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRODUCE PAY, INC., Case No. 20-cv-517-MMA (RBM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE PARTY

FVF DISTRIBUTORS INC., et al., [Doc. No. 75] Defendants. 16 On March 19, 2020, Produce Pay, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action against FVF Distributors Inc. and F. David Avila (collectively, “Defendants”) pursuant to the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 499a et seq. (“PACA”). Doc. No. 1. Plaintiff now moves to substitute Mr. Avila’s surviving spouse—Estella Medellin Barraza—in his place as defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a).1 The motion is unopposed. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to substitute. I. BACKGROUND The parties are familiar with the facts of this case, so the Court does not recite them here. On October 21, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.