Thomas-Weisner

Thomas-Weisner v. Gipson

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20223:19-cv-01999California1,954 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Jonquil THOMAS-WEISNER, Case No.: 19-cv-01999-JAH-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMNT OF

COUNSEL

Connie GIPSON, et al.,

Defendants. [ECF No. 27]

18 Plaintiff Jonquil Thomas-Weisner is a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis 19 (“IFP”) and pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 20 § 1983. Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel is currently pending before the 21 Court. (ECF No. 27.) Specifically, Plaintiff filed form titled “Request for Appointment of 22 Counsel Under The Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e 5(f)(1); Declaration in 23 Support of Request[.]” (Id. at 1.) In support of his request, Plaintiff’s request represented 24 that (1) his claim is meritorious, (2) he has made a reasonably diligent effort to obtain 25 counsel, and (3) he was unable to find an attorney willing to represent him on terms that 26 he can afford. (Id. at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.