Staniforth

Staniforth v. Total Wealth Management, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 20223:14-cv-01899California1,883 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRUCE J. STANIFORTH, an individual Case No.: 14-cv-01899-GPC-JLB and as beneficiary of the Bruce J. 12 Staniforth IRA, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff,

MOTION TO STRIKE ANSWERS

14 v. AND ENTER DEFAULTS

TOTAL WEALTH MANAGEMENT,

INC., et al., Defendants. 18

20 On January 13, 2022, Plaintiff Bruce J. Staniforth (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion to 21 Strike Defendant’s Answers and Enter Default. ECF No. 66. The Court set a briefing 22 schedule allowing for responses and a reply. ECF No. 67. On February 1, 2022, 23 Defendant Douglas David Shoemaker (“Douglas Shoemaker” or “Defendant 24 Shoemaker”) filed a response in opposition. ECF No. 70. No other defendants have 25 responded to the pending Motion. Having considered the papers and the parties’ 26 27 arguments, the Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without a hearing and therefore VACATES the hearing previously set for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.