Dunsmore

Dunsmore v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20223:21-cv-02025California2,746 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

; □ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 || SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 |} DARRYL DUNSMORE, Case No.: 3:21-cv-2025-JO-KSC Petitioner, (1) ORDER DISMISSING PETITION 13 || V. WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND 14 |) ROBERT BURTON, Warden, (2) NOTICE OF OPTIONS DUE TO Respondent.| FAILURE TO EXHAUST STATE COURT REMEDIES AS TO ALL

CLAIMS

17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas 19 || Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In it, he challenges his conviction and sentence ir 20 || San Diego Superior Court case no. SCS215653. ECF No. at 1. For the reasons discussec || below the Court dismisses the Petition without prejudice and provides Petitioner notice □□ 22 || his options for exhaustion of state judicial remedies. 1. BACKGROUND As an initial matter, the …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.