Hammler

Hammler v. Aviles

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20223:17-cv-01185California562 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALLEN HAMMLER, Case No.: 17-cv-01185-AJB-WVG

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

F. AVILES, (Doc. No. 75)

15 Defendant.

Before the Court is pro se prisoner Allen Hammler’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for reconsideration. (Doc. No. 75.) Plaintiff requests that the Court reconsider its decision to adopt the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) and grant Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. (Id. at 1.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration. Reconsideration is “an ‘extraordinary remedy, to be used sparingly in the interests of finality and conservation of judicial resources.’” Wood v. Ryan, 759 F.3d 1117, 1121 (9th Cir. 2014) (quoting Kona Enters., Inc. v. Estate of Bishop, 229 F.3d 877, 890 (9th Cir. 2000). “[A] motion for reconsideration should not be granted, absent highly unusual circumstances, unless the …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.