Scott

Scott v. Yoo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20223:21-cv-01319California4,397 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLIE D. SCOTT, Case No.: 21-cv-1319-MMA (KSC)

CDCR #AY-8804

ORDER DISMISSING FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR Plaintiff,

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

14 vs. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) AND § 1915A(b) AND

DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED

FRANK YOO, M.D., TRI CITY IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS MOOT

MEDICAL CENTER, et al., Defendants. [Doc. No. 12] 19 On July 21, 2021, Billie D. Scott (“Plaintiff”), a state inmate currently incarcerated California Health Care Facility (“CHCF”), located in Stockton, California and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Doc. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) to commence a civil action when he filed his Complaint; instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), along with a Motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.