Frank

Frank v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20223:20-cv-01548California2,463 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANA F., Case No.: 3:20-cv-01548-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING AMENDED

v. JOINT MOTION FOR ATTORNEY

FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Commissioner of

TO JUSTICE ACT

Social Security, 15 Defendant. [ECF No. 22] 16 17

19 20

23 24

26 27 28 Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). ECF No. 22. The parties have filed the Amended Joint Motion in response to the Court’s Order requiring them to file supplemental briefing regarding the reasonableness of the hours and rates billed by Plaintiff’s counsel, as well as evidence of the assignment agreement between Plaintiff and her counsel. See ECF Nos. 20, 21. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the parties’ joint motion. I. BACKGROUND The underlying action involves Plaintiff’s appeal of the Social Security Administration’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits at the agency 11 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.