Esteghalian

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MANIJEH ESTEGHLALIAN, et al., Case No.: 19cv1808-LL-MSB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY; EDCO

PAUPERIS

WASTE AND RECYCLING SERVICES,

15 Defendants. [ECF No. 10]

17 This matter is before the Court on “Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider Proceed In Forma Pauperis for Both Defendants Because They Lost Their Saving and Asset Due to This Claim and Illness” which the Court construes as Plaintiffs’ Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). EFC No. 10. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Proceed IFP is DENIED without prejudice. I. Procedural History Plaintiff Esteghlalian filed a complaint on September 19, 2019 [ECF No. 1] and a motion to proceed IFP on November 12, 2019 [ECF No. 2]. On June 16, 2020, the Court dismissed with leave to amend Plaintiff’s complaint. ECF No. 5. The Court also denied as moot Plaintiff’s IFP motion because…