Meyer

Meyer v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20223:21-cv-00341California6,510 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

26 Plaintiff WILLIAM MEYER, an individual, and DANA GASCAY, an individual 27 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) 28 against Defendants the COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, a public entity, erroneously sued as 2 the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (the “County”); the SAN 3 DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY (the “HHSA”)1; 4 RADY CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL, a California nonprofit organization (“Rady”); 5 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, a California nonprofit 6 organization (“Regents”); ELIZABETH REESE, an individual (“Reese”); KAYLA 7 VALENZUELA, an individual (“Valenzuela”); DR. SHALON NIENOW, an individual 8 (“Dr. Nienow”); TIFFANY PAUGH, an individual (“Paugh”); CATHERINE CRAFT, an 9 individual (“Craft”); TAMI SNYDER, an individual (“Snyder”); DOE HHSA, manager, 10 an unidentified named individual; DOES 1 through 50. ECF No. 1. 11 Before the Court are following motions: (1) the Motion to File Documents Under

HHS was named in the original complaint and is still listed on the docket. Because the County and HHSA are the same…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.