Meyer
Meyer v. County of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
26 Plaintiff WILLIAM MEYER, an individual, and DANA GASCAY, an individual 27 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) 28 against Defendants the COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, a public entity, erroneously sued as 2 the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (the “County”); the SAN 3 DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY (the “HHSA”)1; 4 RADY CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL, a California nonprofit organization (“Rady”); 5 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, a California nonprofit 6 organization (“Regents”); ELIZABETH REESE, an individual (“Reese”); KAYLA 7 VALENZUELA, an individual (“Valenzuela”); DR. SHALON NIENOW, an individual 8 (“Dr. Nienow”); TIFFANY PAUGH, an individual (“Paugh”); CATHERINE CRAFT, an 9 individual (“Craft”); TAMI SNYDER, an individual (“Snyder”); DOE HHSA, manager, 10 an unidentified named individual; DOES 1 through 50. ECF No. 1. 11 Before the Court are following motions: (1) the Motion to File Documents Under
HHS was named in the original complaint and is still listed on the docket. Because the County and HHSA are the same…