Cervantes

Cervantes v. Transdev Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20223:20-cv-01430California572 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM CERVANTES, Case No.: 20-cv-01430-AJB-WVG Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX v. PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE 13 TO FILE EXCESS PAGES (Doc. No. TRANSDEV SERVICES, INC.; and 45.) DOES 1 through 25, Defendants.

16 Presently pending before the Court is Plaintiff William Cervantes’ (“Plaintiff”) ex 17 parte application for leave to file a motion in limine in excess of the Court’s Civil 18 Procedure Rule VI(B) page limitation. (Doc. No. 45.) Defendant Transdev Services, Inc.’s 19 (“Transdev”) filed an opposition in response. (Doc. No. 46.) For the reasons set forth 20 below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s ex parte motion. 21 Civil Case Procedure Rule VI(B)(1) of the Honorable Anthony J. Battaglia, U.S. 22 District Judge, provides “[e]ach side is allowed a maximum of five (5) motions in limine” 23 and “[e]ach motion and each opposition are limited to five (5) pages in length.” Given the 24 district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.