Hastings

Hastings v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20223:19-cv-02217California1,626 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID HASTINGS, Case No. 19-cv-02217-BAS-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S

v. RESPONSE TO THE COURT’S

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

FORD MOTOR COMPANY,

Defendant. (ECF No. 124)

16 17 18 19 20 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed two applications to maintain the following documents under seal: attorney Gregory Sogoyan’s declaration and exhibits filed in support of Plaintiff’s Reply brief for his motion to amend (Apps. to Seal, ECF Nos. 106) and attorney Dara Tabesh’s unredacted declaration and related exhibits in support of Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion for summary judgment (App. to Seal, ECF No. 111). The exhibits requested to be sealed can be grouped into two categories: excerpts from Defendant Ford Motor Company’s 2013 Warranty Policy & Procedure Manual (“Warranty Manual”) (Exs. A–C to Sogoyan Decl., ECF No. 107; Exs. A, C–E to Tabesh Decl., ECF No. 112) and Ford’s Warranty Detail…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.