Flores

The Upper Deck Company v. Flores

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20223:21-cv-01182California6,007 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THE UPPER DECK COMPANY, a Case No.: 21CV1182-GPC(KSC) Nevada corporation,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART THIRD PARTY v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

MIGUEL FLORES, an individual, and [Dkt. No. 26.] DOES 1 -100, inclusive,, 16 Defendant.

18 MIGUEL FLORES, an individual, 19 Third Party Plaintiff, 20 v. 21 ROCCO TENAGLIA, an individual, GEM MINT AUTHENTICATION, INC., a Florida corporation, and ALON 23 KARPUCH, an individual,, 24 Third Party Defendants. 25 Before the Court is Third Party Defendants Gem Mint Authentication, Inc. and Alon Karpuch’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 26.) An opposition was filed by Third Party Plaintiff Miguel Flores. (Dkt. No. 34.) Third Party Defendants then filed their reply. (Dkt. No. 35.) The Court finds that the matter is appropriate for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.