Rosete
Rosete v. California Border Patrol
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ERNESTO ROSETE, an individual, Case No.: 22-cv-89-GPC(AGH) Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS AND SUA SPONTE
CALIFORNIA BORDER PATROL,
DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S
Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO
STATE A CLAIM
15 16 Plaintiff Ernesto Rosete, proceeding pro se, filed a form complaint against an agent 17 of Defendant California Border Patrol. (Dkt. No. 1, Compl.) He also filed a motion to 18 proceed in forma pauperis. (Dkt. No. 2.) Based on the reasoning below, the Court 19 GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and sua sponte DISMISSES 20 the action for failure to state a claim. 21 A. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 22 All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the 23 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 24 $402.1 See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure…