Rosete

Rosete v. California Border Patrol

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20223:22-cv-00089California1,143 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ERNESTO ROSETE, an individual, Case No.: 22-cv-89-GPC(AGH) Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS AND SUA SPONTE

CALIFORNIA BORDER PATROL,

DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S

Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM

15 16 Plaintiff Ernesto Rosete, proceeding pro se, filed a form complaint against an agent 17 of Defendant California Border Patrol. (Dkt. No. 1, Compl.) He also filed a motion to 18 proceed in forma pauperis. (Dkt. No. 2.) Based on the reasoning below, the Court 19 GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and sua sponte DISMISSES 20 the action for failure to state a claim. 21 A. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 22 All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the 23 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 24 $402.1 See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.