Sywula
Sywula v. DaCosta
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRZYSZTOF SYWULA, Case No. 21-cv-01450-BAS-AGS
Plaintiff,
ORDER TERMINATING AS MOOT:
v. (1) MOTION TO DISMISS OR ALEXIS DACOSTA, et al.,
TRANSFER VENUE
Defendants. (ECF No. 8); AND
16 (2) REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO RESPOND TO NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION (ECF No. 24)
Defendant Teleport Mobility, Inc. moved to dismiss Plaintiff Krzysztof Sywula’s Complaint or transfer venue. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint and did not respond to Defendant’s motion. (ECF No. 15.) Defendant replied to its motion, highlighting Plaintiff’s non-opposition and inviting the Court to grant the motion in spite of the Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 24.) Plaintiff then sought leave to respond to Defendant’s filing. (ECF No. 24.) “[A]n amended pleading supersedes the original.” Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1989). Defendant’s…