Gonzalez

Gonzalez v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20223:21-cv-01558California3,006 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRES RODRIGUEZ GONZALEZ, Case No.: 21-CV-1558 TWR (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO

U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)

PROTECTION,

15 Defendant. (ECF No. 10)

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Andres Rodriguez Gonzalez’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC,” ECF No. 10), which was filed in six “parts” in response to the Court’s October 21, 2021 Order (1) Granting Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, (2) Dismissing Without Prejudice First Amended Complaint Pursuant to U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), and (3) Denying Without Prejudice Motion for Appointment of Counsel. (See generally ECF No. 9 (the “Oct. 21 Order”).) As with Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis (“IFP”), the Court is obligated to screen his operative Second Amended Complaint sua sponte 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.