Rewardify, Inc. v. Synvest Canco, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20223:21-cv-00046California4,722 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 REWARDIFY, INC., Case No.: 3:21-cv-00046-H-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK

OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION

SYNVEST CANCO, INC.; RED

JACKET CAPITAL, INC.; ADAM

[Doc. No. 9.] SALAHUDEEN; KEN MCCORD; and DAVE SANDERSON, Defendants. 19 On January 8, 2021, Plaintiff Rewardify, Inc. filed a complaint against Defendants 20 Synvest Canco, Inc., Red Jacket Capital, Inc., Adam Salahudeen, Ken McCord, and Dave 21 Sanderson. (Doc. No. 1, Compl.) On August 9, 2021, Defendants Red Jacket Capital, Inc., 22 Ken McCord, and Dave Sanderson (collectively, the “Red Jacket Defendants”) filed a 23 motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. (Doc. No. 9.) On 24 August 10, 2021, the Court took the matter under submission. (Doc. No. 10.) On September 25 27, 2021, Plaintiff filed its opposition. (Doc. No. 13.) On October 13, 2021, the Red Jacket 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.