Lindland

Lindland v. TuSimple, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20223:21-cv-00417California3,337 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN LINDLAND, an individual, Case No.: 21-CV-417 JLS (MDD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR ORDER FOR

TUSIMPLE, INC.,

CHOICE OF LAW

a California corporation; and DETERMINATION AND DENYING DOES 1–100, inclusive,

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

16 Defendants. IN SUPPORT THEREOF 17 (ECF Nos. 13, 13-2)

Presently before the Court is Defendant TuSimple, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or TuSimple”) Motion for Order for Choice of Law Determination (“Mot.,” ECF No. 13). Also before the Court are Defendant’s Request for Judicial Notice in support thereof (“RJN,” ECF No. 13-2), Plaintiff John Lindland’s (“Plaintiff” or “Mr. Lindland”) Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 14), and Defendant’s Reply in support of the Motion (“Reply,” ECF No. 16). The Court vacated the hearing on the Motion and took the matter under submission pursuant to Civil Local Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.