Rapinoe

Rapinoe v. Gore

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20223:21-cv-01779California7,849 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN JAMES RAPINOE, Case No.: 21-CV-1779 TWR (WVG) Booking #20944774

ORDER (1) GRANTING MOTION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA Plaintiff,

PAUPERIS, (2) DISMISSING

14 vs. ACTION FOR FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM UNDER 28 U.S.C.

§§ 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 1915A(b), AND 16 BILL GORE, Sheriff, DR. (3) DENYING WITHOUT MONTGOMERY, VISTA DETENTION PREJUDICE MOTION FOR

FACILITY DOCTORS, GEORGE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

BAILEY DETENTION FACILITY

DOCTORS (ECF Nos. 2, 3) Defendants. 21 22 Plaintiff Brian James Rapinoe, an inmate currently detained at George Bailey Detention Facility (“GBDF”), located in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See generally ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”).) He has also filed a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.