Doe
Doe v. McAleenan
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 CRISTIAN DOE, et al., Ca se No. 19cv2119 DMS AGS 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING STAY AND v. FINDING OF MOOTNESS, AND GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION KEVIN K. McALEENAN, Acting FOR 90-DAY EXTENSION TO Secretary of Homeland Security; et. al., ANSWER
Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Stay or alternatively Unopposed Motion for 90-Day Extension to Answer, and Suggestion of Mootness. (ECF Nos. 87, 86.) For the following reasons, the motion to stay and suggestion of mootness are denied, and the unopposed motion for a 90-day extension to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is granted. I. INTRODUCTION This case concerns access to counsel for nonrefoulement interviews under the Government’s “Migrant Protection Protocols” …