Marrs

Marrs v. City of Imperial

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20223:22-cv-00180California569 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHRISTOPHER DANIEL MARRS, Case No.: 22-CV-180-CAB-MSB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

COMPLAINT

CITY OF IMPERIAL et al.,

Defendants. [Doc. No. 17]

16 This matter is before the Court on a motion to dismiss by Defendant City of Imperial 17 on the grounds that Plaintiff lacks Article III standing and that the complaint fails to state 18 a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The motion was filed on February 17, 2022, and set a 19 hearing date (for briefing purposes only) of March 24, 2022. Civil Local Rule 7.1.e.2 20 requires a party opposing a motion to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition no 21 later than fourteen calendar days before the noticed hearing. Thus, based on the hearing 22 date of March 24, 2022, Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion to dismiss was due on March 23 10, 2022. No opposition has been filed. Under the local rules, Plaintiff’s failure to oppose 24 “may constitute a consent to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.