Thibodeau

Thibodeau v. ADT Security Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20223:16-cv-02680California3,040 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLAYTON DEL THIBODEAU, Case No.: 16-cv-2680-GPC

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR INTEREST AND

PENALTIES

ADT LLC, d/b/a ADT SECURITY

SERVICES, a/k/a ADT HOLDINGS

INC.,

16 Defendants. [ECF No. 183]

18 On January 14, 2022, Plaintiff Clayton Del Thibodeau (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion 19 for Interest and Penalties based on Defendant ADT LLC’s (“Defendant” or “ADT”) 20 failure to timely pay the money judgment ordered by this Court on October 21, 2019 21 (ECF No. 154, Order on Cross Motions for Re-Taxation of Costs). ECF No. 183. 22 Defendant opposed, ECF No. 185, and Plaintiff replied, ECF No. 186. On March 3, 2022, 23 the Court vacated the motion hearing set for March 4, 2022, and took the matter under 24 submission. ECF No. 187. 25 26 27 I. BACKGROUND This employment action initially involved nine causes of action: (1) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law; (2) whistleblower retaliation; (3) violation 4 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.