Whittle

Whittle v. Saul

Bad Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20223:20-cv-01452California10,073 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAWN WENDY WHITTLE, Case No.: 20cv1452-NLS

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

Social Security, MOTION FOR SUMMARY Defendant. JUDGMENT; and

(2) GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

20 [ECF Nos. 23, 26] 21 Dawn Whittle (“Plaintiff”) brings this action under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and seeks judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for social security disability and supplemental security income based on disability under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S. C. §§ 1381 et seq. ECF No. 9. The parties filed cross- motions for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 23, 26. Plaintiff filed a Reply. ECF No. 27. After considering…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.