Williams v. United States Marshals

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20223:22-cv-00139California1,319 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLY PAUL WILLIAMS, Case No.: 3:22-cv-0139-BAS-BLM #61027298,

ORDER: (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF vs. COUNSEL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14 (ECF No. 6) AND

UNITED STATES MARSHALS, (2) GRANTING MOTION FOR

16 Defendant. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF No. 7) 18 19 On January 31, 2022, Plaintiff Billy Paul Williams, a federal detainee being held at Otay Mesa Detention Center California, and proceeding pro se, initiated this civil action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). (See Compl., ECF No. 1 at 1.) BACKGROUND On February 2, 2022, the Court dismissed the action without prejudice for failure to satisfy the filing fee requirement under 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). (ECF No. 2.) The Court notified Plaintiff that he had days to either (a)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.