Hussaini

Hussaini v. Tsunami VR, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20223:21-cv-00667California3,900 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 21-cv-0667-H(BLM) SYED HUSSAINI, et al.,

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTION TO COMPEL

TSUNAMI VR, INC., [ECF No. 43] Defendant. 16 17 On March 4, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Compel Production of Discovery and Defendant’s Attendance of Deposition and Costs and Fees. ECF No. 43-1 (“MTC”). On March 12, 2022, Defendant Tsunami VR, Inc. filed their opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion. ECF No. 45 (“Oppo.”). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. DISCOVERY RELATED BACKGROUND On November 12, 2021, Plaintiffs served on Defendant a First Set of Requests for the Production of Documents and Things seeking 27 categories of documents and a First Set of Interrogatories. ECF No. 43-2, Declaration of Lauren Valli (“Valli Decl.”) at 2; see also ECF Nos. 43-3; 43-4. On December 13,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.