Wiliams

Wiliams v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20223:21-cv-01167California1,056 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOMMY LEE WILLIAMS, Case No.: 3:21-cv-1167-CAB-WVG

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

v. EXTENSION OF TIME AND

NOTIFYING PETITIONER THE

RAYTHEL FISHER, Warden,

PETITION REMAINS DISMISSED

Respondent. WITHOUT PREJUDICE [Doc. No. 21] 16 On April 14, 2021, Petitioner, currently detained at Vista Detention Facility in Vista, California and proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.1 On June 30, 2021, the Court dismissed the case without prejudice because Petitioner failed to satisfy the filing fee requirement, failed to name a proper respondent, and failed to state a cognizable claim. See ECF No. 3. The Court notified Petitioner that to have his case reopened, he needed to satisfy the filing fee requirement and file a First 23 24 1 The Petition was originally filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit as an “Application for Leave to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.