Thistle

Thistle v. The State of New Hampshire

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20223:21-cv-02072California2,350 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DAVID JOHN THISTLE, Case No.: 21cv02072-LL-BGS

Plaintiff, ORDER: v. (1) DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, PAUPERIS Defendant. (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT [ECF No. 2] 15 I. INTRODUCTION Presently before the Court is the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) of Plaintiff David John Thistle (“Plaintiff”). ECF No. 2 (“Mot.”). Plaintiff, proceeding pro se,1 alleges that the New Hampshire Secretary of State’s website contains unconstitutional limitations on candidate eligibility to run for the United States House of Representatives. See generally ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”). Having considered carefully Plaintiff’s Complaint, IFP Motion, and the applicable law, the Court (1) DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP and (2) DISMISSES the Complaint without prejudice. II. BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges that “while researching The New Hampshire Secretary of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.