Segal

Segal v. Segel

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20223:20-cv-01382California4,266 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SOPHIA SEGAL, Case No. 20-cv-1382-BAS-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. JASON SEGEL, et al., (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY

Defendants. DISMISSAL (ECF No. 68); AND 16 (2) TERMINATING AS MOOT

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS THE SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF

19 No. 74.)

Before the Court is Plaintiff Sophia Segal’s ex parte application for voluntary dismissal of the instant action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). (Mot., ECF No. 68.) Defendants oppose and assert that, should the

1 Also pending is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Lanham Act claim set forth in the Second Amended Complaint and to strike certain new allegations as outside the scope of Rule 15 (SAC, ECF No. 28 Court decide dismissal is warranted, this matter should be dismissed with prejudice. (Opp’n, ECF No. 69.) The Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.