Hastings

Hastings v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20223:19-cv-02217California10,644 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID HASTINGS, Case No. 19-cv-02217-BAS-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al.,

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

Defendants. MOTION TO AMEND (ECF No. 87);

AND

(2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

18 JUDGMENT (ECF No. 85). 19 20 In 2013, Plaintiff David Hastings bought a new truck manufactured by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Throughout more than six years after his purchase, Hastings brought his truck to Ford’s authorized dealerships to have the truck inspected and repaired for various issues, including problems with its Nitrogen Oxide (“NOx”) sensors. In 2019, Hastings brought the present action in state court, naming Ford and a dealership, Ford of Chula Vista, as defendants. Against Ford, Hastings raised a federal claim for breach of express warranty under the Magnusson-Moss Warranty-Federal Trade Commission 28 Improvement Act…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.