Daniel

Daniel v. San Diego County

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20223:21-cv-01412California979 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 QUINTERO DANIEL, Case No. 21cv1412-DMS (BGS)

BOOKING #18148776,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION FOR FAILING vs. TO PROSECUTE IN COMPLIANCE

WITH COURT ORDER

SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF’S

OFFICE,

Defendant. 17 18 On August 5, 2021, Plaintiff Quintero Daniel, incarcerated at the Vista Detention Facility in Vista, California, and proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) The Complaint was accompanied by a Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) On August 11, 2021, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis because he failed to provide the Court with sufficient financial information as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). (ECF No. 3.) This action was dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff to pay the entire civil filing fee or file a properly supported in forma pauperis application on or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.