Briceno

Briceno v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20223:20-cv-01984California9,716 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARMIDA B., Case No.: 20-cv-01984-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MERITS

v. BRIEF

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, (ECF Nos. 11, 12) Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On October 8, 2020, plaintiff Armida B. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for supplemental security income (“SSI”) benefits. (ECF No. 1.) Now pending before the Court and ready for decision is Plaintiff’s merits brief in support of reversal and/or remand. (ECF No. 11.) The Commissioner filed a cross motion and opposition to Plaintiff’s merits brief (ECF Nos. 12, 13), and Plaintiff filed a reply (ECF No. 14). For the reasons set forth herein, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s merits brief, DENIES the Commissioner’s cross motion, and remands this matter for further administrative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.