Briceno
Briceno v. Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARMIDA B., Case No.: 20-cv-01984-JLB
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MERITS
v. BRIEF
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, (ECF Nos. 11, 12) Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On October 8, 2020, plaintiff Armida B. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for supplemental security income (“SSI”) benefits. (ECF No. 1.) Now pending before the Court and ready for decision is Plaintiff’s merits brief in support of reversal and/or remand. (ECF No. 11.) The Commissioner filed a cross motion and opposition to Plaintiff’s merits brief (ECF Nos. 12, 13), and Plaintiff filed a reply (ECF No. 14). For the reasons set forth herein, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s merits brief, DENIES the Commissioner’s cross motion, and remands this matter for further administrative…