Davall

Davall v. Cordero

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20223:20-cv-01968California1,249 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH DAVALL, CDCR #AW-8294, Case No.: 20-cv-1968-JLS-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. THIRD MOTION TO APPOINT

COUNSEL

A. CORDERO; D. WHITE; WHITMAN,

Defendants. [Doc. No. 69] 16 Plaintiff Joseph Davall (“plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging defendants violated his rights under the United States Constitution. See Doc. No. 1. Plaintiff alleges that he was targeted by other inmates because he is a convicted sex offender, and that defendants failed to protect him from assault by his cellmate in violation of his constitutional rights. See generally id. Before the Court is plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (the “Motion”). Doc. No. 69. This is plaintiff’s third request for counsel. See Doc. Nos. 19, 44. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.