Navarro

Williams v. Navarro

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20223:18-cv-01581California1,736 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LANCE WILLIAMS, Case No.: 18-CV-1581 TWR (KSC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) OVERRULING

v. PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS, (2) ADOPTING REPORT AND OFFICER NAVARRO, et al.,

RECOMMENDATION, AND

Defendants. (3) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

17 (ECF Nos. 114, 140, 147)

Presently before the Court is Defendants J. Mejia, O. Navarro, E. Estrada, and A. Silva’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Mot.,” ECF No. 114), which Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford recommends the Court grant. (See generally ECF No. 140 (“R&R”).) Plaintiff Lance Williams filed timely Objections to the Report and Recommendation (“Obj.,” ECF No. 147), to which Defendants filed a Response (“Reply,” ECF No. 148). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. Having carefully considered Judge Crawford’s R&R, the Parties’ arguments, the record, …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.