Romano

Romano v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20223:20-cv-00840California4,536 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIA ELISE R., Case No.: 20-cv-00840-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON JOINT MOTION FOR

v. JUDICIAL REVIEW

14 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, [Doc. No. 21] Defendant. 17 On May 4, 2020, plaintiff Mia Elise R. (“plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking judicial review of defendant’s denial of her application for disability benefits. Doc. No. 1. Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for Judicial Review (the “Joint Motion” or “Jt. Mot.”). Doc. No. 21. In the Joint Motion, plaintiff requests to have her application for benefits remanded to the Social Security Administration (the “Administration”) for further proceedings, and defendant (“defendant” or the “Commissioner”) moves to have her determination that plaintiff is not disabled affirmed. See generally id. The Court has carefully considered the parties’ arguments, the applicable law, and the evidence in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.